Frequently Asked Questions related to Ditch Drainage

Can portions of ditches be altered to increase capacity?

In order to increase the capacity of a ditch from a 2 year design flow to a 5 year design flow for example an improvement would be required. The viewers’ consideration of the capacity of the ditch based on the engineer’s evaluation of both design and as-built capacity given the current capacity demand of the drainage system in this area. To achieve a 5-year design flow, the channel capacity would have to be improved beyond design and as-built capacity. “Improvement” means the enlarging, extending, straightening, or deepening of an established and constructed drainage system. A petition is required to improve a drainage system. A petition must be signed by: (1) at least 26 percent of the owners of the property affected by the proposed improvement; (2) at least 26 percent of the owners of property that the proposed improvement passes over; (3) the owners of at least 26 percent of the property area affected by the proposed improvement; or (4) the owners of at least 26 percent of the property area that the proposed improvement passes over. The cost of the improvement is paid for by assessments to properties determined to be benefitted by the improvement.

With accelerated flow, how can we get back to capacities needed to accept the amount of water?

Will the ditch systems ever be returned to design capacity?

There are concerns with capacity downstream of the ditch.

What is the explanation of initial peak versus double peak?

Can bonding be stretched out over a length of time to limit annual cost for repairs?

Tiling and accelerated drainage from areas away from ditch send too much water and are assessed too little.

The Municipality receives greater benefits for road and pond than reflected. Benefits should be higher.

Who will make decisions on repairs and will they begin downstream or upstream?

How can the ditch perform if we are not allowed to change it?

Sediment loading - Area 1 and Area 2 are both contributing?

Why are direct benefits highest to lands most affected by water? Shouldn’t these receive damages?

Are there grant funds available to help pay for repairs?

CRP/US Fish and Wildlife land is out of viewers report - Why? Are they brought in if they option out of their contract in the future?

Was tile drainage taken into account for benefitted area? Should more area receive direct benefits spanning farther from the ditch?

Why are side slopes not being altered to a lesser angle?

What would need to be provided to show that values are incorrect in areas along the ditch system; e.g. flood photos, frequency, elevations?

If land is in CRP, wetland restoration, and tree plantings, how can adjustments be made to reflect current land practice instead of cropping benefit?

Areas along ditch take additional water due to accelerated drainage. The benefits should not be so high.